Former Rep. Donald Sherwood (R-PA)


Image by dbking
110 D St. SE, Unit #215…
By Bill Toland, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

TUNKHANNOCK, Pa. — In this old lumber town, part of the state’s conservative northeast, the Sherwoods are the local version of the Kennedys: wealthy, iconic and, now, because of U.S. Rep. Donald L. Sherwood, knee-deep in scandal.

Sherwood, 64, a Republican, is embroiled in a salacious, he-said, she-said affair with a Peruvian-born woman named Cynthia Ore, 29. Ore alleges that her five-year relationship with Sherwood, who is married with three grown daughters, turned violent.

News of the relationship began to dribble out of Washington, D.C., at the end of April, when a political foe sent a copy of a police report to the Times Leader of Wilkes-Barre and other papers. The report, and the newspaper story that followed, said police visited Sherwood’s Washington apartment in September after Ore called 911 to tell police that, during the course of a back rub, Sherwood had tried to choke her.

He denied that, saying he never choked her, and that she was the one who interrupted the back rub when she "jumped up" and went to the bathroom to call 911.

No criminal charges were filed, but a civil suit has been. In June, Ore sued Sherwood for .5 million, saying he bruised her, punched her and yanked her hair, and that police didn’t take her charges seriously. She stayed with him through the abuse, the suit says, because Sherwood promised to marry her. Sherwood, while saying Ore’s lawsuit, in general, and the accusations of abuse, in particular, are without merit, has admitted to the affair.

He’d kept quiet, offering only a quick apology for the "pain" he’s caused, until 10 days ago, when he filed his response to Ore’s lawsuit and issued a more in-depth statement:

"For about five years, I had an affair I deeply regret," the statement says. "Although it was intermittent and ended last year, nothing I say can diminish the pain and hurt I have caused my wife and family. While I can’t change or erase what I did, I accept full responsibility for my behavior, and I apologize to my wife, my family and to the people I represent in Congress."

He added, "I want to be absolutely clear that I never physically hurt or abused Ms. Ore. I will defend myself to the fullest extent possible against these malicious and baseless allegations." In the court papers, filed in Washington, D.C., Sherwood says he can’t remember how he met Ore, while Ore says they met at a Young Republicans meeting in 1999.

Ore’s attorney, Patrick Regan, declined to comment on Sherwood’s statement.

Around Sherwood’s rural, 13-county congressional district, people are just as likely to be suspicious as they are to be sympathetic. Sherwood’s reputation as an upstanding, family-values politician is now sullied by the scent of hypocrisy, some say.

"My problem is not with the fact that the guy decided to fool around. Guys do that," said John Braun, a retiree and registered Republican who lives 15 miles west of Tunkhannock. Braun’s problem, he said, is that he feels his intelligence has been insulted by Sherwood’s story that Ore abruptly "jumped up" and ran to the bathroom in mid-back rub, for no good reason.

"To me, that doesn’t ring like an event that could have actually occurred that way," Braun said.

But in leafy Tunkhannock, where Sherwood’s name still graces the wall of a main street car dealership, the man is more likely to be given doubt’s benefit.

"He’s human," said Paul Litwin III, a lawyer with an office on Tunkhannock’s short business strip. He noted that police had investigated Ore’s September phone call and declined to press charges. "If she’s lying about that, there’s a possibility that she’s lying about the abuse," Litwin said. He added that "any type of abuse" would be unforgiveable if Ore’s accounts were proven true.

But if they’re not true, Sherwood’s affair was private, Litwin said, and shouldn’t have played out in the papers. "Most people I speak with are more sympathetic toward the family than disgusted toward him," he said.

Many defenders in this town were reluctant to talk about Sherwood’s fortunes, protective of one of their own. The Sherwoods still keep a home and do business here, eating at in-town restaurants and buying arrangements from the local florist.

In his pre-Congress life, Sherwood lived by the all-American model of service and hard work. He went to Dartmouth College, joined the Army, opened a car dealership at age 26. When his father died, Sherwood inherited part of the family estate, worth .4 million at the time.

Sherwood’s supporters think so much of him here that a local media chain, Times Shamrock Communications, initially declined to cover the Sherwood saga, which most newspapers or TV outlets would have considered newsworthy. After the police report became public, The Scranton Times, one of three papers in the chain, criticized the Times Leader for writing about it.

"Where is the connection between the politician’s private moral life and his public performance?" Lawrence Beaupre, managing editor of The Scranton Times, wrote in a letter to his readers. The Times Leader, he said, was guilty of "sanctimonious self-righteousness" in its decision to publish a story.

Times Leader Managing Editor David Iseman answered in a column of his own, saying that the "alliance" of papers and TV stations that initially declined to report on the hubbub was neglecting its duty. He said the inter-media sparring "kind of wasted a little bit of our time."

The papers are 20 miles away from each other. The Tribune and The Citizens’ Voice of Wilkes-Barre, the two other Shamrock papers, also refused to write about Sherwood, at first.

Whether the allegations affect Sherwood’s political career is unclear. His district is heavily Republican, and no Democrat has challenged him since his second congressional race in 2000, when he defeated Pat Casey, son of the late governor and brother of state Treasurer Robert P. Casey Jr.

GOP colleagues are offering support, with U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, of Penn Hills, doing so during a recent visit to the area.

"I don’t know how that’s going to shake out," Santorum said, quoted by the Times Leader. "All I would suggest is that, again, until we know all the facts, [we] look at the job that Congressman Sherwood is doing and make decisions based on the facts."

Some Democrats are lining up to challenge Sherwood, believing that he’s weakened. And at least one Republican politician, state Rep. Jerry Birmelin, R-Wayne, said he would consider a run at the seat, but only if Sherwood stepped aside. (Sherwood has no plans to do so, saying he’s running for re-election next year.)

Tunkhannock’s parable on lust and fallibility wouldn’t be complete without a lesson in mercy. Heather Johns, who owns Reese Florist and the next-door bridal boutique, said even if Ore’s abuse charges prove to be true, Sherwood ought to be forgiven by his town. "I don’t think anybody should be judging him on one incident," she said.

exercise your rights


Image by zombieite
when i arrived in arizona, a coworker and i started discussing off-roading in all of the beautiful remote places the state had to offer. my coworker told me i needed 4 things:

1. a good pair of sunglasses
2. tinted windows
3. a wide-brimmed hat
4. a gun

i’d never even handled or fired a gun until i came to arizona. the idea of getting one both scared me and intrigued me. i’m not a "conservative" or a "republican" as those terms are used nowadays, but i’ve always believed in gun rights from a theoretical standpoint. it has always shocked me when i hear stories of mass shootings. i always wonder, why didn’t any of those innocent bystanders have a gun? the answer isn’t always "because it’s illegal" (i.e. school campuses). most people have come to believe that it’s acceptable to outsource our personal security to the police. i respect and admire the police. i have friends and relatives who are police officers. but realistically, the job of the police is to get there as soon as they can, clean up the mess, maybe do a little detective work, and every now and then, catch a bad guy (or girl).

"when seconds count, the police are minutes away." –bumper sticker

living in the "blue states" for so long might have had something to do with my inexperience with guns. the more-democratic "blue" states on the coasts are much less gun-friendly than the more-republican "red" states in the middle. our country has an important history with guns, and that’s why it’s written right into the constitution that our right to own guns "shall not be infringed". what’s been happening over the past few decades, however, has been that gun rights have been infringed–er, "regulated"–more and more, bit by bit.

nevertheless, in many places out west, it’s still perfectly legal to carry a gun on your hip, with no special permits or anything. to me, an easterner, this seems like an overtly political act. all the employees at the gun store (who are also the teachers of my gun classes) carry guns on their hips (at least when they are at work). they tell stories of being harassed by law enforcement and confronted by concerned strangers. one of my teachers said that if he’s not allowed to carry a gun into an establishment, he stops visiting that establishment. places he’s been kicked out of include the local mall and the county fair. he says he hasn’t been to either in a decade. after hearing those stories, i realized that it is a very political act to carry a gun, especially openly, and i admire them for it.

the biggest hassle of carrying a gun is dealing with all the places you’re not allowed in to. it’s absurd that a gun owner is not considered a threat outside the post office, but inside it she is (federal law). outside of lovin’ spoonfuls (a delicious vegetarian restaurant that happens to serve alcohol) she is not a threat, but inside she is (state law–even if she does not drink while in the establishment). there are so many surprising and difficult-to-abide-by gun laws that almost every gun owner inadvertently violates one or two of them occasionally. this is one reason why people often prefer to carry concealed. if you have no way to be sure you’re not violating a law without hiring a lawyer to follow you around everywhere, it’s easier to avoid scrutiny by concealing your weapon. this can be done legally here, with a permit acquired after a couple classes in safety, shooting, and the legal issues involved with gun owership and concealed-carry.

the problem with concealed-carry is that criminals are not deterred by the sight of a gun on your hip, so you may be mugged even though you’re carrying. then you have to decide what to do. that’s a tough decision to make, and it’s an even tougher one to execute properly if your plan involves actually pulling out your gun. usually, the best thing to do, carrying or not, is throw your money on the ground and run.

the advantage to concealed carry is you’ll be harassed less by people who don’t realize that guns are legal and safe when used correctly (or not used at all, which is usually the correct thing to do). it’s often the police themselves that don’t even realize it’s legal for regular citizens to carry guns on their hips, since it happens so rarely (especially in states where permits are required and nearly impossible to obtain). the best thing about concealed-carry is that it has the potential to reduce crimes committed against everyone, even those who aren’t carrying guns, since criminals cannot know who is and who isn’t carrying.

the next thing to rant a bit about is the drug war. i’ve never used or sold drugs and never will. nevertheless, i think the drug war is absurd. one of the most frightening aspects of it is that police have abandoned the "knock and announce" procedure they used to follow when serving warrants. nowadays, if you’re suspected of a drug crime, they will simply throw small bombs (flash-bang grenades, intended as a non-lethal distraction, but which occasionally permanently injure or kill) into your house and break in through windows and doors while shouting "police! search warrant!". of course, home invading criminals are quite capable of shouting "police" just as well as the police can. homes are entered this way because it is very easy to flush a large amount of drugs down a toilet in a small amount of time.

the problem with this is, what if they have the wrong house? it happens fairly often. what if they’re acting on bad information? that also happens fairly often. these situations often lead to police officers being shot and the shooters being convicted of murder when the shooters only thought they were defending their homes against invading criminals.

what a mess.

another thing i’ve come to understand is why "gun nuts" stockpile guns and ammunition.

in researching all of these arcane gun laws, i’ve discovered that one trick that is often used by gun-fearing legislators is to "chip away" at gun rights rather than take them away altogether. they will outlaw some kind of gun, but only if you don’t own a gun like that already. this angers gun owners and pro-gun legislators, but since it doesn’t require people to turn in their existing guns to the police, it is seen as less of a draconian violation of rights. automatic weapons were outlawed in the 80s (i approve of this law, since i don’t think they are necessary for self-defense), but only if you didn’t own one already. in washington dc, handguns were outlawed in the home in the 70s, but if you already had one you were exempt. this pattern is repeated time and time again.

imagine yourself as a gun owner, wanting to preserve your rights. wouldn’t it make sense to buy as many guns and as much ammunition as you could? tomorrow they might outlaw revolvers or semiautomatics. perhaps they will outlaw guns of a certain caliber. perhaps they will outlaw hollow-point ammunition (it is more likely to kill, which of course makes it more useful for both crimes and self-defense). but you can rest assured that, if you own that stuff already, you’ll be exempt.

no, i’m not stockpiling guns or ammo. and no, i’m not turning into a gun nut. if i could wish every gun off the face of the earth, i would. but since guns exist, i believe that i should be able to have one in case i need it. i see it as a tool. i have no emotional attachment to the hammer in my toolbox, and i have no emotional attachment to my gun.

"better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it." –bumper sticker

WPA-46-65507 WWII Signal Corps Photo


Image by R. Lanning
3 may 46

ichiro kiyose, tojo’s lawyer ponders over legal information with his shoes off at opening session of arraignment of 28 japanese war criminals in war ministtry building, tokyo, japan.

Photographer: Bakal

Jack “Legs” Diamond and attorneys, leaving federal court in New York. Convicted of owning an unlicensed still and conspiring to violate the Prohibition laws.


Image by Boston Public Library
File name: 08_06_002770

Title: Jack "Legs" Diamond and attorneys, leaving federal court in New York. Convicted of owning an unlicensed still and conspiring to violate the Prohibition laws.

Creator/Contributor: Jones, Leslie, 1886-1967 (photographer)

Date created: 1931-08-08

Physical description: 1 negative : glass, black & white ; 4 x 5 in.

Genre: Glass negatives

Subjects: Criminals; Lawyers; Courthouses

Notes: Title and date from information provided by Leslie Jones or the Boston Public Library on the negative or negative sleeve.

Collection: Leslie Jones Collection

Location: Boston Public Library, Print Department

Rights: Copyright © Leslie Jones.

Preferred citation: Courtesy of the Boston Public Library, Leslie Jones Collection.

B. H. Tabor


Image by Dystopos
B. H. Tabor, in a residence of less tlian one year in Birmingham, achieved a commanding position among the attorneys of Jefferson County.

His parents, Aquila and Francis Tabor, nee Ware, were natives of Georgia, where they resided until their marriage, and, in 1856, immigrated to Lafayette County, Mississippi, where they resided the remainder of their days. The father departed this life in 1878, and the mother in 1881.

Our subject was the fourth of a family of seven children, and was reared upon a farm, which was his father’s occupation, and received limited early educational advantages. Possessing an ambitious spirit, and endowed with high natural abilities, he early decided upon the profession of law, and, at the age of twenty, entered the University of Georgia, located at Athens, and, in the fall of 1871, was admitted to the, bar at Water Valley, Mississippi, where he established an extensive practice, which extended also to Lafayette County. In 1878 he removed to Oxford, Lafayette County, where he remained for three years, and then joined his brother, K. A. Tabor, at Fort Smith, Arkansas, with whom he was associated for a period of one year, the firm subsequently becoming Taliaferro, Tabor & Tabor. This alliance continued for two years, when Colonel Taliaferro removed to Birmingham.

In the spring of 1886 Mr. Tabor decided, upon the solicitations of Colonel Taliaferro, to become a resident of the Magic City, and thus was formed the firm of Lane, Taliaferro & Tabor, one of the strongest legal associations in Alabama.

Mr. Tabor labored assiduously and faithfully, devoting his entire attention to the vast and increasing practice which was entrusted to them, and, in many of the most important cases tried in the county, he took a leading part in conducting them, and was foremost in the arguments, in which he ranks as one of the best speakers in the country. As a criminal lawyer his rank is especially high.

Mr. Tabor is endowed with what may be termed a natural legal intellect. He grasps quickly and accurately legal principles, and discriminates correctly. His memory is remarkable, retaining not only principles but the names of codes and books. He is an untiring worker, and aggressive in any case he undertakes, from the smallest to the greatest. He never looks upon the opposite side, and, determining to win, never prepares for defeat. He is personally exceedingly agreeable and prepossessing; his form is tall, erect, and stalwart, denoting a magnificent constitution and perfect health ; his nature is frank, genial, and generous ; his hand is as liberal as his heart is sympathetic, and his popularity extends to all professions and classes.

Mr. Tabor has also interested himself in real estate transactions, in which he has also been remarkably successful. He is one of the incorporators of the Smithfield Land Company, and one of its officers. He is a member of the Knights of Pythias.

Mr. Tabor was married October 9, 1875, to Bliss L. E. Oliver, of Eureka, Panola County, Mississippi. Four children bless this union, Oliver K., Loise E., Bee, and Edward.

Mr. and Mrs. Tabor are members of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South.

- from Jefferson County and Birmingham Alabama: History and Biographical, edited by John Witherspoon Dubose and published in 1887 by Teeple & Smith / Caldwell Printing Works, Birmingham, Alabama

Rootscamp 2008, DC 035


Image by kiskeacity
Turns out Matt is a DC-based criminal defense lawyer who went to school at Fordham in the Bronx and has a few theories about the Puffy-Tupac-Biggie debacle. He also has a company called Blue Collar Books. I think Barack can use his help in PA!

365 Memphians – Ruchee Patel


Image by ilovememphis
Ruchee Patel (photographed outside of 201 Poplar) is a criminal defense lawyer. She moved to Memphis from Bolivar, Tenn. in 2007.

MISTER (MR.) .. A MAN’S MAGAZINE .. March 1950 …..item 1..This case has sex, lies and video tapes — just like on reality TV…They found her Guilty of lying to the police. (July 05, 2011) …


Image by marsmet462
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Casey Anthony was found not guilty Tuesday of killing her 2-year-old daughter three years ago in a case that captivated the nation as it played out on national television from the moment the toddler was reported missing.

…..item 1)…..Yahoo! News…Casey Anthony acquitted of killing young daughter

By KYLE HIGHTOWER – Associated Press | AP – 1 hr 53 mins ago……Tuesday July 05, 2011

news.yahoo.com/casey-anthony-acquitted-killing-young-daug…

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Casey Anthony was found not guilty Tuesday of killing her 2-year-old daughter three years ago in a case that captivated the nation as it played out on national television from the moment the toddler was reported missing.

Anthony wept after the clerk read the verdict, which jurors reached after less than 11 hours of deliberation over two days. The 25-year-old was charged with first-degree murder, which could have brought the death penalty if she had been convicted.

Instead, she was convicted of only four counts of lying to investigators looking into the June 2008 disappearance of her daughter Caylee. Her body was found in the woods six months later and a medical examiner was never able to determine how she died.

Anthony will be sentenced by the judge on Thursday and could receive up to a year in jail for each lying count. Since she has been in jail since August 2008, she could walk free then.

After the verdict was read, Casey Anthony hugged her attorney Jose Baez and later mouthed the words "thank you" to him.

Prosecutors sat solemnly in their seats, looking stunned. Prosecutor Jeff Ashton shook his head slightly from side to side in apparent disbelief. Across the room, Anthony’s father wiped tears from his eyes. Without speaking to Casey, he and his wife left the courtroom escorted by police as the judge thanked the jury.

"While we’re happy for Casey, there are no winners in this case," Baez said at a news conference afterward. "Caylee has passed on far, far too soon. And what my driving force has been for the last three years has been always to make sure that there has been justice for Caylee and Casey, because Casey did not murder Caylee. It’s that simple."

He added: "This case has brought on new challenges of all of us. Challenges in the criminal justice system, challenges in the media, and I think we should all take this as an opportunity to learn and to realize that you cannot convict someone until they’ve had their day in court."

State Attorney Lamar Lawson thanked the prosecutors from his office who tried the case, and he said the case was never about the defendant.

"It has always been about seeking justice for Caylee and speaking on her behalf," he told reporters.
Jurors told the court that they didn’t want to talk to the media at the courthouse.

Anthony’s attorneys claimed that the toddler drowned accidentally in the family swimming pool, and that her seemingly carefree mother in fact was hiding emotional distress caused by sexual abuse from her father.

Prosecutors contended that Caylee was suffocated with duct tape by a mother who loved to party, tattooed herself with the Italian words for "beautiful life" in the month her daughter was missing and crafted elaborate lies to mislead everyone from investigators to her own parents.

Captivated observers camped outside the courthouse to jockey for coveted seats in the courtroom gallery, which occasionally led to fights among those desperate to watch the drama unfold.

Prior to the verdict on Tuesday, the judge said: "To those in the gallery please do not express any signs of approval or disapproval upon the reading of the verdict."

Anthony did not take the stand during the trial, which started in mid-May. Because the case got so much media attention in Orlando, jurors were brought in from the Tampa Bay area and sequestered for the entire trial.

Baez conceded that his client had told elaborate lies and invented imaginary friends and even a fake father for Caylee, but he said that doesn’t mean she killed her daughter.

"They throw enough against the wall and see what sticks," Baez said of prosecutors during closing arugments. "That is what they’re doing … right down to the cause of death."

He tried to convince jurors that the toddler accidentally drowned in the family swimming pool and that when Anthony panicked, her father, a former police officer, decided to make the death look like a murder by putting duct tape on the girl’s mouth and dumping the body in woods about a quarter-mile away.

Her father firmly denied both the cover-up and abuse claims. The prosecution called those claims "absurd," saying that no one makes an accident look like a murder.

Lead prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick concluded the state’s case by showing the jury two side-by-side images. One showed Casey Anthony smiling and partying in a nightclub during the month Caylee was missing. The other was the tattoo she got a day before her family and law enforcement first learned of the child’s disappearance.

"At the end of this case, all you have to ask yourself is whose life was better without Caylee?" Burdick asked. "This is your answer."

Prosecutors hammered on the lies Anthony, then 22, told from June 16, 2008, when her daughter was last seen, and a month later when sheriff’s investigators were notified. Those include the single mother telling her parents she couldn’t produce Caylee because the girl was with a nanny named Zanny — a woman who doesn’t exist; that she and her daughter were spending time in Jacksonville, Fla., with a rich boyfriend who doesn’t exist; and that Zanny had been hospitalized after an out-of-town traffic crash and that they were spending time with her.

Among the trial spectators was 51-year-old Robin Wilkie, who said she has spent ,000 on hotels and food since arriving June 10th from Lake Minnetonka, Minn. She tallied more than 100 hours standing in line to wait for tickets and got into the courtroom 15 times.

She said she’s fascinated with the case because she is a victim of violent crime.

"True crime has become a unique genre of entertainment," Wilkie said. "Her (Casey’s) stories are so extreme and fantastic it’s hard to believe they’re true but that’s what engrosses people. This case has sex, lies and video tapes — just like on reality TV."
.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
.
.

There is a traditional career for lawyers include going into private practice you can work in a small, medium or large sized firm, made up of few attorneys to hundreds of them; law firm; law department in a corporation of all types usually have a number of lawyers working for them and known as in-house counsel; the benefit of government law jobs is that you can practice any area of the law at the local, state or federal level; or in academics is a relatively small amount of lawyers works in law schools.

Another career to use law degree in non traditional ways are non profit organizations because law school develops strong persuasive writing skills on problem solving and analytical skills, these skills can then be applied to obtaining grants and funding. Also useful in positions officers at universities, hospitals, bankers and political campaigns. So if you want practice law for a few years and decide that a career in law is not for you, in out there many alternative career options are at your disposal.